Tuesday, January 20, 2015

The Trail Ends and The Ranking Begins

Today we had our last interview of the season, and I expect each of you are winding down as well. Congratulations on all you have accomplished and getting it all done. Your well-worn interview suit can go to the cleaners, trash or bonfire. You can start planning that amazing trip you have earmarked for spring. And it is also time to step back and look objectively at the programs you interviewed with.  

Your last major residency application task is your rank list.  You have until  9pm on February 25th to finalize your Rank List.  And if you are anything like me, you are on the third iteration of your complex spreadsheet desperately trying to sort through them all. 

"How to make your Rank List" was one of the first topics we tackled here, and very little has changed about this part of the process. Our Rank List Tips still hold true, and you ultimately should still Go with your gut, in defiance of what your giant spreadsheet is telling you. 

There are some differences between this year and last, however overall competitiveness has not changed significantly. The ratio of available spots to total applicants is the same. Both numbers have been gradually and proportionally increasing for years. This does NOT appear to be what Medical School Dean's have been claiming, as the major change this year is in the number of applications each person has sent out AND in the number of interviews they have done. I do not blame the Dean's for giving this advice, their job is to ensure that all of their students match. They will do what they think is necessary to accomplish that goal.

The difference this year is that there are fewer applicants with a number of programs to rank (8 - 10) who should feel comfortable about matching. Instead, there appears to be an unusually large divide between the "haves" (>10 programs, AKA: the over-interviewers) and the "have nots" (<8 programs to rank). This has introduced added uncertainty into an already stressful situation.  Programs fear that they have interviewed the same candidates as EVERYONE else and won't match enough of them.  Applicants with low numbers of interviews fear that they are only padding the back-end of rank lists at programs that interviewed extra or played it safe in offering interviews. Most of the concern is likely unfounded, given the steady growth in BOTH spots and applicants, though we will not know how this plays out until after the match.  

The advice that follows has held true in past years and is likely to still be relevant:   
  1. Rank any program that you would consider to be better than scrambling (SOAPing) to a surgical pre-lim. year or to family medicine. There is effectively no scramble within EM.  If you don't match, your next shot at EM is next year.  
  2. Rank programs in the order you like them.  The match algorithm favors the students. You will match to the program you rank highest that gets to your spot on its Rank List.  There is no advantage to you in ranking a more "realistic" program ahead of a "reach".  
  3. Once you settle on your #1 program, you need to let them know.  Programs want to be liked, just like everyone else. Just don't tell more than one program they are your #1.  The world of Residency Program Directors is a relatively small one and you don't want to get caught in a lie. 
For more on making your rank list see these posts from Academic Life in Emergency Medicine's EM match adviseMaking Your Rank List and Top 10 Tips When Making Your Rank List, as well as our post on Going with your gut that includes a more detailed explanation of the Match Algorithm in case you do not believe the whole "student weighted" thing.

Best of luck!  You are almost there.  

Lucienne Lutfy-Clayton is a Clerkship Director and Associate Residency Director. She believes in this whole "student-weighted match algorithm" business and thinks that you should too.  

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

A New Year and a New Application Cycle

For students interested in Applying to Emergency Medicine for the 2016 Match, the application cycle starts now. Really. 

This post is to get you started on the process and to serve as a guide to some of the resources on this blog.

Your first task is to decide if EM is right for you as a career (be sure to follow the links to ERcast and St.Emlyn's at the bottom of the page - they offer very helpful perspectives).

You may not be able to make a final decision on EM until you complete your first rotation but you will need to lay the groundwork for your application in advance. As you are planning your fourth year schedule, these are some of the biggest questions to consider (linked to what we have to say about them):

The advice you find on this blog is not one-size-fits-all. We try to reflect the consensus opinions of the membership of Clerkship Directors in Emergency Medicine (CDEM) and the Council of Residency Directors (CORD), but we do not speak for them. Nor does their membership always agree. When something is controversial, we try to address that controversy. We believe we are a source of sound, balanced, and accurate advice on becoming an emergency physician in the United States. We also have no doubt that you will find different opinions elsewhere. 

To help you sort through all of the differing opinions you may find, you need the guidance of a local EM advisor, in addition to your Dean. You need someone who knows the EM application process and can help you navigate issues specific to students from your school and region. If you cannot find anyone, or you need advice from a different region you can often find help from SAEM's e-advisors program or the EMRA mentorship program

Adam Kellogg is an Associate Residency Director and formerly an Emergency Medicine Clerkship Director.  He is a member of the CORD EM Student Advising Task Force and of the SAEM Resident and Student Advisory Committee. He has written for EMRA about the EM Match